Friday, 14 June 2013

Will Snowden Inspire More Whistleblowers To Come Forth?

Susanne Posel, Contributor |

Daniel Ellsberg, former whistleblower,commends Snowden for having leaked the most important material of our time.

Ellsberg points out that: “The fact that congressional leaders were “briefed” on this and went along with it, without any open debate, hearings, staff analysis, or any real chance for effective dissent, only shows how broken the system of checks and balances is in this country.”

Ellsberg hopes that Snowden will have inspired more whistleblowers to come forward to expose the NSA and the secret dealings of the federal government so that they cannot continue to operate in the shadows.

The American Civil Liberties Union, who is a customer of the Verizon Business network Services, has filed a lawsuit against the US government “charging that the [PRISM] program violates Americans’ constitutional rights of free speech, association, and privacy.”

According to the ACLU’s website : “[The] complaint filed today explains that the dragnet surveillance the government is carrying out under Section 215 infringes upon the ACLU’s First Amendment rights, including the twin liberties of free expression and free association. The nature of the ACLU’s work—in areas like access to reproductive services, racial discrimination, the rights of immigrants, national security, and more—means that many of the people who call the ACLU wish to keep their contact with the organization confidential. Yet if the government is collecting a vast trove of ACLU phone records—and it has reportedly been doing so for as long as seven years—many people may reasonably think twice before communicating with us.”

As of now, Snowden is missing from the hotel in Hong Kong. It is known that Snowden checked out of the hotel, yet where he went is a mystery.



The mainstream media is endeavoring to discover who whistleblower Edward Snowden is.

MSM describes him as “a high school dropout turned analyst with high-level security clearance.”

Snowden is the son of Elizabeth Snowden “chief deputy clerk for administration and information technology for US District Court in Baltimore.”

He grew up in North Carolina and spent time in Maryland with his mother. His father is Lonnie Glenn Snowden, former member of the Coast Guard.

Reports say that Snowden dropped out of high school in his sophomore year and attended Anne Arundel Community College for 6 years, yet never obtained a degree.

Senator Barbara Mikulski has questions about how Snowden, who was a high-school dropout “gained a top-secret clearance and access to high-level government secrets.”

An internal review has been initiated to discern the “potential damage to national security” that Snowden caused by coming forth about the NSA’s PRISM program.

The purpose of the review will find “whether the leaks have compromised sources or surveillance methods, and would likely look for chatter among intelligence targets to see if the leaks have prompted them to change tactics.”

A public review of the secret data mining conducted by the federal government on Americans will most likely not manifest because of the “threat” to national security.

Jay Carney, press secretary for the Obama administration claims that the president is interested “in having the debate and the legitimacy of asking probing questions about these matters.”

Carney also revealed that the Obama administration has “strengthened protections for government workers who come forward through proper channels to air concerns.”

A by-product of Snowden’s revelation has prompted US defense contractors such as Boeing to issue reminders to employees “about the importance of proper handling of classified or sensitive information.”

Stephen Kohn, executive director of the National Whistleblower Center (NWC) asserts that the Obama administration has gone back on his 2008 campaign promise to “extend whistleblower protections to national-security workers.”

Kohn, who spoke with Norman Eisen, classmate of Obama, said: “I confronted Norm … that there had been a promise to protect national security whistleblowers and let them have access to court. He told me to my face that the administration was not going to honor that promise, and I was free to tell the world that they broke it. That’s what he said. The White House completely reversed their position. So the Enhancement Act that he is now praising does not cover NSA, CIA among others — it completely stripped out all protections for national security whistleblowers.”

Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters that the PRISM program “uses pattern analysis of millions of phone calls from the United States, even if those numbers have no known connection to terrorism.”



 An anonymous law enforcement official said that the federal government is building a case against Snowden. The nature of the charges has not been decided; yet this person believes that it is “unlikely that Snowden would be charged with treason, which carries the death penalty as a punishment, and therefore could complicate extradition from foreign countries.”

 Author Bio

 Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news-site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun bythe corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

Must See Commentary: “I Don’t Know What We’re Going To Wake Up To Tomorrow…”

Mac Slavo, Contributor |

With seemingly endless scandals rocking the country, economic malaise spreading across the world, and super powers positioning their military assets on the grand chessboard, one can’t help but notice that the entire planet is devolving into completely insanity.

Uncertainty is at such a level that it’s impossible to know what happens next.

These people – our leaders, the purported best and brightest members of politics, finance, and industry – have brought us to the brink. What we are witnessing is a complete destabilization of our socio-economic systems and the rule of law, and it’s being fueled by pandemonium in the upper echelons of the global power structure.

Tying it all together can be a daunting task and certainly can’t be done in a thirty second mainstream media sound bite, but Chris Greene of AMTV does a pretty incredible job of it in about five minutes.

This is one commentary that’s not to be missed:


Alright, so Obama’s about to launch World War III. I believe it’s already started. And this is all on the heels of the massive scandals. Too many to count. Honestly, I don’t know what I’m going to wake up to tomorrow. 
All I know is that we’ve had scandal after scandal – Benghazi, the IRS scandal, the fact that he’s directly lied to our faces regarding the wire-tapping, not just of the Associated Press, but of innocent Americans, the surveillance state… total lies.
… 
This next war is going to be biological… nuclear terror… there’s already a cyber war occurring… this is violence and terror at a whole new scale… 
It really is unbelievable. So count on it, count on it. I don’t know what we’re going to wake up to tomorrow… we really don’t know. 
We just know what the agenda is – lie straight to the American peoples’ faces as you take them to war and confiscate all their wealth – of which they’ve done a fantastic job.
… 
So, the reset button, the massive reset button which always occurs throughout history – you know we see this with the rise and fall of empires – is war. That’s how they reset everything financially. 
So that’s what’s on the Obama agenda as he sits in the war room… That’s what we have coming… war, death, destruction, and to a great extent could absolutely be the Armageddon.
You can follow Chris Greene at the AMTV web site, Facebook or the Greenewave blog.

Author Bio

Mac would be considered by some to be a doom and gloomer, though he believes reality is reality, and he tries to assign no positive or negative personalperceptionsto any particular event. Mac provides personal commentary and a spin on news and current events. Mac Slavo writes and edits thewebsite: SHTFPlan.com

22 Nauseating Quotes From Hypocritical Establishment Politicians About The NSA Spying Scandal

Michael Snyder, Contributor |

Establishment politicians from both major political parties are rushing to defend the NSA and condemn whistleblower Edward Snowden. They are attempting to portray Edward Snowden as a "traitor" and the spooks over at the NSA that are snooping on all of us as "heroes". In fact, many of the exact same politicians that once railed against government spying during the Bush years are now staunchly defending it now that Obama is in the White House. But it isn't just Democrats that are acting shamefully. Large numbers of Republican politicians that love to give speeches about "freedom" and "liberty" are attempting to eviscerate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The government is not supposed to invade our privacy and investigate us unless there is probable cause to do so. Apparently many of our politicians misunderstood when they read the novel 1984 by George Orwell.

It wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual. We should be thanking Edward Snowden for exposing the deep corruption that is eating away at our own government like cancer. Now the American people need to pick up the ball and start demanding answers, because without a doubt we are going to see establishment politicians from both major political parties try to shut this scandal down. Establishment Democrats and establishment Republicans both love the Big Brother surveillance grid that the U.S. government has constructed, and they are both making it abundantly clear that they will defend the NSA to the very end. The following are 22 nauseating quotes from hypocritical establishment politicians that show exactly how they feel about the NSA spying scandal...

#1 Barack Obama: "I think it’s important to understand that you can’t have 100 percent security and then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society."

#2 Barack Obama in 2007: "This Administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand… That means no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. And it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists… We will again set an example for the world that the law is not subject to the whims of stubborn rulers, and that justice is not arbitrary."

#3 Speaker Of The House John Boehner on what he thinks about NSA leaker Edward Snowden: "He’s a traitor."

#4 U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham: "I hope we follow Mr. Snowden to the ends of the Earth to bring him to justice."

#5 U.S. Senator Al Franken: "I can assure you, this is not about spying on the American people."

#6 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: "For senators to complain that they didn’t know this was happening, we had many, many meetings that have been both classified and unclassified that members have been invited to"

#7 U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell: "Given the scope of these programs, it’s understandable that many would be concerned about issues related to privacy. But what’s difficult to understand is the motivation of somebody who intentionally would seek to warn the nation’s enemies of lawful programs created to protect the American people. And I hope that he is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."

#8 U.S. Representative Peter King on why he believes that reporters should be prosecuted for revealing NSA secrets: "There is an obligation both moral, but also legal, I believe, against a reporter disclosing something which would so severely compromise national security."

#9 Director of National Intelligence James Clapper making a joke during an awards ceremony last Friday night: "Some of you expressed surprise that I showed up—so many emails to read!"

#10 Director Of National Intelligence James Clapper about why he lied about NSA spying in front of Congress: "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner"

#11 National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden: "The president has full faith in director Clapper and his leadership of the intelligence community"

#12 White House press secretary Jay Carney: "...Clapper has been straight and direct in the answers that he's given, and has actively engaged in an effort to provide more information about the programs that have been revealed through the leak of classified information"

#13 Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee: "There is no more direct or honest person than Jim Clapper."

#14 Gus Hunt, the chief technology officer at the CIA: "We fundamentally try to collect everything and hang onto it forever."

#15 Barack Obama: "Nobody is listening to your telephone calls."

#16 Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency: "We do not see a tradeoff between security and liberty."

#17 An exchange between NSA director Keith Alexander and U.S. Representative Hank Johnson in March 2012...

JOHNSON: Does the NSA routinely intercept American citizens’ emails?

ALEXANDER: No.

JOHNSON: Does the NSA intercept Americans’ cell phone conversations?

ALEXANDER: No.

JOHNSON: Google searches?

ALEXANDER: No.

JOHNSON: Text messages?

ALEXANDER: No.

JOHNSON: Amazon.com orders?

ALEXANDER: No.

JOHNSON: Bank records?

ALEXANDER: No.

#18 Deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino: "The intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks"

#19 U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss: "This is nothing new. It has proved meritorious because we have gathered significant information on bad guys and only on bad guys over the years."

#20 Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton on NSA leaker Edward Snowden: "Let me ask, who died and made him king? Who gave him the authority to endanger 300 million Americans? That's not the way it works, and if he thinks he can get away with that, he's got another think coming."

#21 Senior spokesman for the NSA Don Weber: "Given the nature of the work we do, it would be irresponsible to comment on actual or alleged operational issues; therefore, we have no information to provide"

#22 The White House website: "My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration."

Right now, the NSA is building a data collection center out in Utah that is so massive that it is hard to describe with words. It is going to cost 40 million dollars a year just to provide the energy needed to run it. According to a 2012 Wired article entitled "The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)", this data center will contain "the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches" in addition to "parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases" and anything else that the NSA decides to collect...
Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.
The goal is to know as much about everyone on the planet as possible.

And the NSA does not keep this information to itself. As an article in USA Today recently reported, the NSA shares the data that it collects with other government agencies "as a matter of practice"...
As a matter of practice, the NSA regularly shares its information — known as "product" in intelligence circles — with other intelligence groups.
So when the NSA collects information about you, there is a very good chance that the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the IRS will have access to it as well.

But the U.S. government is not the only one collecting data on American citizens.

Guess who else has been collecting massive amounts of data on the American people?

Barack Obama.

According to those that have seen it, the "Obama database" is unlike anything that any politician has ever put together before. According to CNSNews.com, U.S. Representative Maxine Waters says that this database "will have information about everything on every individual"...
"The president has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life," she added. "That’s going to be very, very powerful." 
Martin asked if Waters if she was referring to "Organizing for America." 
"That’s right, that’s right," Waters said. "And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before." 
Waters said the database would also serve future Democratic candidates seeking the presidency.
Perhaps this helps to explain why so many big donors got slapped with IRS audits immediately after they wrote big checks to the Romney campaign.

We are being told to "trust" Barack Obama and the massive government surveillance grid that is being constructed all around us, but there has been example after example of government power being grossly abused in recent years.

A lot of Americans say that they do not care if the government is watching them because they do not have anything to hide, but is there anyone out there that would really not mind the government watching them and listening to them 24 hours a day?

For example, it has been documented that NSA workers eavesdropped on conversations between U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq and their loved ones back home. Some of these conversations involved very intimate talk between husbands and wives. The following is from a 2008 ABC News story...
Faulk says he and others in his section of the NSA facility at Fort Gordon routinely shared salacious or tantalizing phone calls that had been intercepted, alerting office mates to certain time codes of "cuts" that were available on each operator's computer.

"Hey, check this out," Faulk says he would be told, "there's good phone sex or there's some pillow talk, pull up this call, it's really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, 'Wow, this was crazy'," Faulk told ABC News.

Faulk said he joined in to listen, and talk about it during breaks in Back Hall's "smoke pit," but ended up feeling badly about his actions.
Is this really what we want the future of America to look like?

Do we really want the government to watch us and listen to us during our most intimate moments?

Feel free to express what you think about this NSA spying scandal by posting a comment below...

Author Bio

Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogsThe American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. You can follow him onTwitter here

Check out Michael's new book - "The Beginning of the End"

Thursday, 13 June 2013

DHS Admits Boston Training Drill Involving Backpack Explosives Planned Months Before Marathon

Anthony Gucciardi, intellihub.com |

The Department of Homeland Security has gone public with an admission that an exercise was planned months before the Boston Marathon bombings that involved backpacks being used to detonate explosives by rogue terrorists.

According to the DHS documents acquired by the Boston Globe, the agents were planning on conducting training exercises centered around a fictitious terrorist group called ‘Free America Citizens’, a group that would plant backpacks full of explosivesaround Boston that the detectives would be forced to track down. Ultimately, of course, this ended up happening at the Boston Marathon itself with precise accuracy. The Globe report reads that “the city was hit with a real terrorist attack executed in a frighteningly similar fashion.”

And the DHS isn’t denying that the training exercise manifested itself at the Boston Marathon, as detailed in the back-end article on the Boston Globe that I discovered while browsing the news.
“The real thing happened before we were able to execute,” a Boston police official told the Boston Globe in the report.
The exercise, labeled as “Operation Urban Shield,” was funded by a $200,000 Homeland Security grant. It was planned months before the Boston Marathon, and it was scheduled to ‘take place’ in official capacity this weekend, according to the sources. But the exercise admission lends further credence to the ignored eyewitness account of bomb sniffing dogs and bomb squads running a training exercise during the morning of the Boston Marathon. Was this training exercise part of Operation Urban Shield?

Interestingly, they specifically detailed that this terrorist group (that presumably is based off of ‘right wing extremists’ and the sovereign citizens movement) would carry a logo of a metal skull wearing an Uncle Sam hat. I’m not claiming there’s a relationship, but I find it funny that even their logo matched up with real events from the Boston Marathon bombings. It was in fact the apparent security at the event that was spotted wearing clothing adorning the image of skulls that turned out to be the logo for the Craft International private security firm.

I will be reporting more on Operation Urban Shield as more information becomes available.

Why You Should Care That The Gov Is Spying On You

Susanne Posel, Contributor |

It seems that the mainstream media (MSM) haspolled Americans and determined that 45% of them do not mind being spied on by the federal government as long as it was for preventing terroristic attacks.

Those participants were asked: “should the government be able to monitor everyone’s e-mail to prevent possible terrorism?”

According to Pew, who conducted the poll: “Currently 62% say it is more important for the federal government to investigate possible terrorist threats, even if that intrudes on personal privacy. Just 34% say it is more important for the government not to intrude on personal privacy, even if that limits its ability to investigate possible terrorist threats.”

An estimated 56% said that it was acceptable for the US government to analyze phone records searching for terrorists.

Over 1,000 people participated in the study . It seems that older Americans are more likely to give up their privacy for national security.

It was found that Americans do not mind that President Obama is spying on them; however knowing that former President George W. Bush had authorized sweeping surveillance on US citizens is unacceptable.

In 2006, a similar poll was conducted which found that 51% of Americans said it was fine with them that the presidency authorized surveillance on US citizens.

In another MSM poll , it was shown that 65% of Republicans and independents view government surveillance as intrusive. Thirty-nine percent of Democrats polled said that the government should not have access to phone records to combat terrorism.

A recent FoxNews poll showed that 68% of participants say that the US government should stay out of their private lives.

Senator Rand Paul commented that “just because Congress approved it doesn’t make it right. Congress has about a 10 percent approval rating, so I think we’re doing things that the public doesn’t approve of.”

Senator Ron Wyden wants to initiate Congressional hearings regarding the NSA programs exposed with Edward Snowden’s revelations.

According to Wyden: “It is impossible for the American people to have an informed public debate about laws that are interpreted, enforced, and adjudicated in complete secrecy. When talking about the laws governing Intelligence operations, the process has little to no transparency. Declassifying FISA Court opinions in a form that does not put sources and methods at risk will give the American people insight into what government officials believe the law allows them to do.”

Wyden has a bill to be introduced that would mandate the federal government disclose the opinions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) when determinations on collecting phone records and internet communications on Americans are approved.

The bill “would require the Attorney General to declassify significant Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) opinions, allowing Americans to know how broad of a legal authority the government is claiming to spy on Americans under the PATRIOT Act and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.”

Wyden is supported by several Senators:

• Patrick Leahy
• Dena Heller
• Mark Begich
• Al Franken
• Jon Tester

Leahy said: “For years, I have pressed for information about the business records program authorized by the PATRIOT Act to be declassified. I am proud to join in this bipartisan legislative effort to increase openness and transparency so that we can shed further light on the business records program authorized by this law.”

Heller explained: “Of course, ensuring Americans’ safety is one of our government’s most important responsibilities, but there is a careful balance between protecting Americans and honoring the Fourth Amendment. This legislation is a measured approach that will bring more transparency to the FISA court and respect the American people’s right to know how and when the government may be accessing their personal information.”

Distractions abound, as MSM are asking Americans whether or not Snowden is a patriot or traitor.

Snowden maintains: “The public needs to decide whether these programs and policies are right or wrong.”

By keeping the public asking questions about Snowden, the MSM are moving attention away from the crux of the issue – as only they can.

The debate beginning divides the opinions of the populace and keep arguments to superficial trends such as whether or not Snowden is a good person and if he is attractive.

The debate should be redirected to the actions of the NSA against the American people; actions that are still being used as of this moment.

Privacy versus security can be summed up in a quote from Founding Father Benjamin Franklin: “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Author Bio

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news-site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

Hearing On UFO Disclosure

L. A. Marzulli, lamarzulli.wordpress.com | 

The following YOUTUBE clip is from the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure, which happened a few weeks ago. The event took place in Washington DC and was attended by Ex military personal, congressmen and women, law enforcement, scientist, former astronauts, government officials, and researchers. Dr. Roger Leir, who has been in all of the Watchers films was present as well.

The UFO conversation is being dominated by those who hold to the opinion that the phenomena is truly extraterrestrial in origin. In other words what is manifesting are beings and entities from lets say, Zeta Reticuli or the Pleiades star system. However, there is another explanation that is not being considered and it is the interdimensional hypothesis, which states that these beings are not aliens from other worlds but are powerful entities who, in the words of Jacque Valle, aremessengers of deception.

Most of the church is ignorant of what transpired in Washington a few weeks ago, and won’t address the phenomena at all. This is unfortunate and in my opinion shows a lack of discernment as well as living with a head-in-the-sand mentality.

There is a cat and mouse game that continues with UFO sightings. They are witnessed, photographed, filmed and seen by thousands of people and the numbers are growing. Yet, for some reason most Christians won’t address the phenomena. We are the folks who believe in the virgin birth, two gold coins appearing in fishes mouths, talking donkey’s, floating ax heads, staffs which turn into serpents, men who walk on water, rocks that gush water, water turned into wine and finally a dead man rising from a tomb three days after he died! With that in mind why is it that the church can’t seem to cope with the UFO phenomena? We should be at the vanguard not the rear.

UFOs are real, burgeoning and NOT going away and as I have stated before, I believe this is the coming great deception that 2nd Thessalonians speaks of. There will be an apostasy, (The Greek word is Apostasia, which means apostasy) an event which causes men and women to depart — not the rapture — from what they once believed in.

Look at the picture above. What will you do if you walk out of your house and see that? How will you react? Will you rebuke first and ask questions later, or will you be overwhelmed by what you are seeing. Will you believe the lie that will be told, that these beings created us, genetically manipulated us, started our civilizations and religions and now, at this critical juncture in history, they have returned to usher us into a time of peace, prosperity, and knowledge.

It’s coming folks and those who were gathered in Washington several weeks ago are well aware that disclosure of the UFO presence is only a matter of time.

When I interviewed Cris Putnam on Acceleration Radio last week, he made it clear that the Vatican is well aware of the so-called Alien presence and in fact are awaiting and alien saviour to come.

[...]

Whistleblowing: Exemplary Patriotism

Stephen Lendman, Contributor |

Whistleblowing reflects doing the right thing. It exposes wrongdoing. It does so because it matters.

Edward Joseph Snowden follows a noble tradition. Others before him established it. Daniel Ellsberg called his NSA leak the most important in US history. More on him below.

Expressions of patriotism can reflect good or ill. Samuel Johnson said it’s the last refuge of a scoundrel. Thomas Paine called dissent its highest form. So did Howard Zinn.

According to Machiavelli:

"When the safety of one's country wholly depends on the decision to be taken, no attention should be paid either to justice or injustice, to kindness or cruelty, or to its being praiseworthy or ignominious."

Tolstoy said:

"In our day the feeling of patriotism is an unnatural, irrational, and harmful feeling, and a cause of a great part of the ills from which mankind is suffering; and…consequently, this feeling should not be cultivated, as is now being done, but should, on the contrary, be suppressed and eradicated by all means available to rational men."

Philosophy Professor Stephen Nathanson believes patriotism involves:

special affection for one's own country;

a sense of personal identification with the country;

special concern for the well-being of the country; and

willingness to sacrifice to promote the country's good.

Socrates once said:

"Patriotism does not require one to agree with everything that his country does, and would actually promote analytical questioning in a quest to make the country the best it possibly can be."

The best involves strict adherence to the highest legal, ethical and moral standards. Upholding universal civil and human rights is fundamental. So is government of, by and for everyone equitably. Openness, accountability and candor can't be compromised.

When governments ill-serve, exposing wrongdoing is vital. It takes courage to do so. It involves sacrificing for the greater good. It includes risking personal harm and welfare. It means doing what's right because it matters. It reflects patriotism's highest form.

Daniel Ellsberg, Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are best known. So is Mordechai Vanunu. More on him below. Few remember Peter Buxtun. He's a former US Public Health Service employee.

He exposed the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. About 200 Black men were infected. It was done to watch their progression. They were left to die untreated. Whistleblowing stopped further harm.

A. Ernest Fitzgerald held senior government positions. In 1968, he exposed a $2.3 billion Lockheed C-5 cost overrun. At issue was fraud and grand theft. Nixon told aides to "get rid of that son of a bitch."

Defense Secretary Melvin Laird fired him. Fitzgerald was a driving force for whistleblower protections. He fought for decades against fraud, waste and abuse. He helped get the 1978 Civil Reform Act and 1989 Whistleblower Protection Act enacted.

Gregory Minor, Richard Hubbard and Dale Bridenbaugh are called the GE three. They revealed nuclear safety concerns. So did Arnold Gundersen, David Lochbaum and others. At issue then and now is public safety over profits.

Mordechai Vanunu was an Israeli nuclear technician. He exposed Israel's secret nuclear weapons program. He paid dearly for doing so.

He was charged with espionage and treason. In 1986/87, he was secretly tried and sentenced. He was imprisoned for 18 years. He was confined in brutalizing isolation. He's been harassed and deprived of most rights since.

Daniel Ellsberg called him "the preeminent hero of the nuclear era." In July 2007, Amnesty International (AI) named him "a prisoner of conscience." He received multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations.

Vanunu said "I am neither a traitor nor a spy. I only wanted the world to know what was happening." People have every right to know.

Mark Whitacre was an Archer Daniels Midland senior executive. He exposed price-fixing, wire and tax fraud, as well as money laundering.

He had his own cross to bear. He was prosecuted and imprisoned. He lost his whistleblower immunity. After eight and a half years, he was released on good behavior.

Jeffrey Wigand was Brown & Williamson's research and development vice president. He went public on 60 Minutes. He exposed deceptive company practices. He was fired for doing so.

B & W enhanced cigarette nicotine content. It was done without public knowledge. At issue was increasing addiction. Wigand told all. He received death threats for doing so. He now lectures worldwide and consults on tobacco control policies.

Gary Webb was an award-winning American journalist. His investigative work exposed CIA involvement in drugs trafficking. His book "Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion" told what he knew.

New York Times, Washington Post, and other media scoundrels assailed him. They did so wrongfully and viciously. Then and now they support CIA crimes. They abhor truth and full disclosure. They ruined Webb's career. They did so maliciously.

In December 2004, Webb was found dead at home. He died of two gunshot wounds to the head. Reports called it suicide. Critics believe otherwise. Two wounds suggest murder. Doing the right thing involves great risks. Webb paid with his life.

Swiss lawyer Marc Hodler was International Ski Federation president and International Olympic Committee member.

In 1998, he exposed 2002 Salt Lake City winter games bid-rigging. Olympism profiteering, exploitation and corruption is longstanding.

Deceptive hyperbole promotes good will, open competition, and fair play. Olympism's dark side reflects marginalizing poor and other disenfranchised groups, exploiting athletes and communities, as well as sticking taxpayers with the bill for profit.

Harry Markopolos exposed Bernie Madoff's hedge fund operations. He called them fraudulent. He obtained information firsthand. He got them from fund-of-fund Madoff investors and heads of Wall Street equity derivative trading desks.

He accused Madoff of operating "the world's largest Ponzi scheme." Large perhaps but not the largest.

Wall Street firms make money the old fashioned way. They steal it. They do so through fraud, grand theft, market manipulation and front-running. They scam investors unaccountably. They bribe corrupt political officials. In return, they turn a blind eye.

Compared to major Wall Street crooks, Madoff was small-time. Others mattering most control America's money. They manipulate it fraudulently for profit.

Coleen Rowley's a former FBI agent. She documented pre-9/11 Agency failures. She addressed them to Director Robert Mueller. She explained in Senate Judiciary Committee testimony. She now writes and lectures on ethical decision-making, civil liberty concerns, and effective investigative practices.

Joseph Wilson's a former US ambassador. He exposed Bush administration lies. He headlined a New York Times op-ed "What I Didn't Find in Africa."

"Did the Bush administration manipulate intelligence about Saddam Hussein's weapons programs to justify an invasion of Iraq," he asked?

"Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat."

Bush administration officials accused Wilson of twisting the truth. So did Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and other scoundrel media editors. They front for power. Wilson explained what people have a right to know. He was unjustifiably pilloried for doing so.

Wendell Potter was a senior CIGNA insurance company executive. He explained how heathcare insurers scam policyholders. They shift costs to consumers, offer inadequate or unaffordable access, and force Americans to pay higher deductibles for less coverage.

Sibel Edmonds is a former FBI translator. She founded the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC). She did so to aid "national security whistleblowers through a variety of methods."

The ACLU called her "the most gagged person in the history of the United States." She knows firsthand the consequences of secret, unaccountable government operations.

Her memoir is titled "Classified Woman: the Sibel Edmonds Story."

Previous articles discussed Mark Klein. He's a former AT&T employee turned whistleblower. He revealed blueprints and photographs of NSA's secret room inside the company's San Francisco facility. It permits spying on AT&T customers.

Karen Kwiatkowski's a retired US Air Force lieutenant colonel. She exposed Defense Department misinformation and lies. She discussed how doing so drove America to war.

Ann Wright's a former US Army colonel/State Department official. In 1997, she won an agency award for heroism.

She's more anti-war/human rights activist/person of conscience than whistleblower. In 2003, she resigned from government service. She did so in protest against war on Iraq.

Edward Joseph Snowden continues a noble tradition. On June 8, London's Guardian headlined "Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower: 'I do not expect to see home again.' "

He leaked information to The Guardian and Washington Post. He exposed unconstitutional NSA spying. He served as an undercover intelligence employee.

Asked why he turned whistleblower, he said:

"The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting."

"If I wanted to see your emails or your wife's phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards."

"I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things."

"I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under."

NSA spies globally, he said. Claims about only doing it abroad don't wash. "We collect more digital communications from America than we do from the Russians," he said.

Previous articles said NSA works with all major US telecom companies. They do so with nine or more major online ones. They spy on virtually all Americans.

They target everyone they want to globally. NSA capabilities are "horrifying," said Snowden. "You are not even aware of what is possible."

"We can plant bugs in machines. Once you go on the network, I can identify (it). You will never be safe whatever protections you put in place."

Asked what he thought might happen to him, he said "Nothing good."

He left America. He moved to Hong Kong. He fled for his safety. He knows he can't hide. If US authorities want him targeted, they'll act no-holds-barred.

If they want him arrested, they'll find him. If they want him disappeared, imprisoned and tortured, he's defenseless to stop them. It they want him dead, they'll murder him. Rogue states operate that way. America's by far the worst.

DNI head James Clapper accused Snowden of "violat(ing) a sacred trust for this country….I hope we're able to track whoever is doing this," he said.

These type comments expose America's dark side. So does unconstitutional NSA spying and much more. Washington flagrantly violates fundamental rule of law principles. It does so ruthlessly. At stake is humanity's survival.

Snowden fears recrimination against his family, friends and partner. He'll "have to live with that for the rest of (his) life," he said.

"I am not going to be able to communicate with them. (US authorities) will act aggressively against anyone who has known me. That keeps me up at night."

Asked what leaked NSA documents reveal, he said:

"That the NSA routinely lies in response to congressional inquiries about the scope of surveillance in America."

America "hacks everyone everywhere." he said. "(W)e are in almost every country in the world."

"Everyone, everywhere now understands how bad things have gotten - and they're talking about it."

On June 9, London Guardian editors headlined "Edward Snowden: more conscientious objector than common thief," saying:

What's next is certain. US authorities "will pursue Snowden to the ends of the earth." America's "legal and diplomatic machinery is probably unstoppable."

Congress should eagerly want to hear what Snowden has to say, said Guardian editors. They should "test the truth of what he is saying."

They know full well. Many or perhaps most congressional members are fully briefed on what goes on. They're condone it. So do administration and judicial officials.

Obama could stop it with a stroke of his pen. So can congressional lawmakers. Supreme Court justices could uphold the law.

Lawlessness persists. Moral cowardice pervades Washington. America's dark side threatens everyone. There's no place to hide.

Author Bio

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site atsjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the ProgressiveRadio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Check out Stephen's new book "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity."


The Rest Of The World Is Absolutely Disgusted With Our Big Brother Spying Methods

Michael Snyder, Contributor |

The rest of the world has found out that the U.S. government has been listening to their phone calls and watching what they do on the Internet and they do not like it one bit. Outrage has been pouring in from all over the planet, and one member of the European Parliament is even comparing the NSA to the Stasi. But instead of stepping back and reevaluating our Big Brother spying methods now that they have been revealed, Barack Obama and other leading members of Congress are defiantly declaring that there is nothing wrong with these methods and that no changes will be made.

The U.S. government is going to continue to invade the privacy of the citizens of the rest of the world as much as it possibly can, and our leaders don't seem to really care what the international response is. And make no mistake - the goal of the U.S. intelligence community is to literally know everything about everyone. The chief technology officer of the CIA, Gus Hunt, made the following shocking admission back in March: "We fundamentally try to collect everything and hang onto it forever." He followed that statement up with this gem: "It is really very nearly within our grasp to be able to compute on all human-generated information." In other words, they want it all, and they nearly have the capacity to gather it all already. So where does this end? Will the U.S. intelligence community ever be happy until they have every piece of data on every single person on the entire planet? Do we really want a government that collects "everything" and hangs on to it "forever"?

Thanks to Edward Snowden, the rest of the globe is starting to understand the extent to which the U.S. government has been spying on them. Needless to say, a lot of people are extremely upset about this.

In Germany (a country that knows a thing or two about Big Brother tactics), some prominent politicians are publicly denouncing the surveillance that the U.S. government has been doing on their citizens. In fact, one German politician has accused the U.S. of employing"American-style Stasi methods"...
In a guest editorial for Spiegel Online on Tuesday, Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger said reports that the United States could access and track virtually all forms of Internet communication were "deeply disconcerting" and potentially dangerous. 
"The more a society monitors, controls and observes its citizens, the less free it is," she said.
"The suspicion of excessive surveillance of communication is so alarming that it cannot be ignored. For that reason, openness and clarification by the U.S. administration itself is paramount at this point. All facts must be put on the table." 
Markus Ferber, a member of Merkel's Bavarian sister party who sits in the European Parliament, went further, accusing Washington of using "American-style Stasi methods".
In Italy, the government official in charge of data protection, Antonello Soro, said that the surveillance that the NSA is doing "would not be legal in Italy" and would be "contrary to the principles of our legislation and would represent a very serious violation".

In Russia (another country with a long history of using Big Brother tactics), President Vladimir Putin has expressed significant concern about the NSA spying program and there are even rumors that Russia will be offering asylum to Edward Snowden...
Alexey Pushkov, head of the Duma's international affairs committee and a vocal US critic, said on Twitter: "By promising asylum to Snowden, Moscow has taken upon itself the protection of those persecuted for political reasons. There will be hysterics in the US. They only recognise this right for themselves." 
He continued: "Listening to telephones and tracking the internet, the US special services broke the laws of their country. In this case, Snowden, like Assange, is a human rights activist."
But even more important than what foreign politicians think about the NSA spying scandal is what average people all over the globe think. This scandal is causing millions of average people all over the planet to look at the United States with disgust and disdain. How can we hold ourselves out as the "defenders of freedom" to the rest of the globe when we are openly telling them that we are going to spy on them as much as we possibly can? How do we expect the rest of the world to look at us as "the good guys" when we are selfishly grabbing and recording all of their emails, phone calls and Internet searches without any concern for their privacy whatsoever?

What makes all of this even worse is that our top intelligence officials are making jokes about this scandal. For example, just check out the wisecracks that the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, was making at an awards ceremony on Friday...
With the current and past directors of national intelligence at the Omni Shoreham to honor former CIA and National Security Agency chief Michael Hayden, the result in speeches and interviews with intel professionals was a gumbo of outrage, worry and humor. 
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told the black-tie crowd of more than 700 he would “address the elephant in the room” and proceeded, to applause, to denounce “the unauthorized leaks as reprehensible and egregious.” Clapper characterized the program as completely legal, debated and reauthorized by Congress under strict oversight and by court order “to make our nation safe and secure.” 
He then cracked a few jokes. “Some of you expressed surprise that I showed up—so many emails to read!” Clapper said. Greeting fellow banqueter John Pistole, the administrator of the Transportation Security Administration who recently reversed a planned policy to permit air travelers to carry certain knives on planes, Clapper said, “John, can I borrow your pocket knife?”
How in the world can he make a joke about reading our emails at a time like this?

This is how arrogant the U.S. intelligence community has become. They feel like they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

For example, back in March Clapper flat out lied to the U.S. Congress about the surveillance that the NSA is doing. When he was asked by Senator Ron Wyden if the NSA was collecting any information on the American people, Clapper completely denied it.

The following is from a transcript of that exchange...
"Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Oregon Republican Sen. Ron Wyden asked Clapper at the March 12 hearing. 
"No, sir," Clapper responded. 
"It does not?" Wyden pressed. 
Clapper recanted and said: "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect -- but not wittingly."
Apparently Clapper must have "forgotten" that the government is forcing all of the big telephone companies to turn over all of their call records to the NSA every single month.

And you know what? The truth is that the government is not just collecting "metadata" about our phone calls. The content of our calls is being recorded and stored as well. Just check out this story from the Blaze...
Hollywood actor Shia LaBeouf in 2008 during an appearance on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno detailed how he learned phone calls were allegedly being recorded. 
Promoting the film “Eagle Eye,” which according to IMDb shows how “technology of everyday life[is used] to track and control,” LaBeouf told Leno that an FBI consultant for the movie said one in five phone calls made are recorded and logged. 
“And I laughed at him,” LaBeouf said. 
“And then he played back a phone conversation I’d had two years prior to joining the picture,” LaBouf continued. 
Both Leno and LaBeouf concluded it was “extremely creepy.”
The American people, along with the people of the entire planet, deserve the truth about this.

Unfortunately, Barack Obama is certainly not going to tell us the truth, and there will probably only be a half-hearted effort by some members of Congress to get to the bottom of things.

That is why it is going to be important to take this to court, and thankfully a couple of lawsuits are already in the works.

According to U.S. News & World Report, one of these lawsuits is being filed by a former Justice Department prosecutor...
Former Justice Department prosecutor Larry Klaymanamended an existing lawsuit against Verizon and a slew of Obama administration officials Monday to make it the first class-action lawsuit in response to the publication of a secret court order instructingVerizon to hand over all phone records of millions of American customers on an "ongoing, daily basis." 
Klayman told U.S. News he will file a second class-action lawsuit Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia targeting government officials and each of the nine companies listed in a leaked National Security Agency slideshow as participants in the government's PRISM program.
And according to USA Today, the ACLU has also filed a lawsuit...
National Security Agency surveillance programs came under more scrutiny Tuesday as the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit and a prominent senator and Internet giant Google called on the Obama administration to disclose more information. 
In its lawsuit, the ACLU said an NSA program that harvests phone calls violates the rights of all Americans. 
"The program goes far beyond even the permissive limits set by the Patriot Act and represents a gross infringement of the freedom of association and the right to privacy," said Jameel Jaffer, the ACLU's deputy legal director.
Hopefully these lawsuits will reveal more details about the spying that has been taking place.

There is also a "bipartisan coalition" of 86 Internet companies and civil liberties organizations that have sent a letter to Congress demanding action on these issues. You can read the full letter right here. Some of the organizations involved include the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Reddit, Mozilla, FreedomWorks, and the Center for Digital Democracy.

Will Congress listen to them?

Probably not.

But at least they are trying to do something about this.

The key will be to get the American people outraged enough about all of this that they won't forget about it in a week or two. And that is not an easy thing to do.

There have been a couple of public opinion polls taken over the past few days that show some very curious results. A Rasmussen survey found that 59 percent of Americans are against the government secretly collecting our phone records and only 26 percent are in favor. But a Washington Post survey found that 56 percent of Americans consider the collecting of our phone records to be "acceptable" and only 41 percent consider the practice to be "unacceptable".

How could those two surveys get such wildly different results?

A lot of it is in the way that they ask the questions.

In the end, our politicians don't really care too much about what the general public thinks anyway. They are just going to continue to do what they have been doing and the rest of the world will continue to become even more disgusted with us.

We are recklessly destroying our global reputation and our leaders do not even seem to care. But someday America will need some friends, and when that day arrives we may find that we don't have too many left.

Author Bio

Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogsThe American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. You can follow him onTwitter here

Check out Michael's new book - "The Beginning of the End"

Recovery: Record 23 Million American Households Receive Food Stamps

Mac Slavo, Contributor |

Just when you thought America was coming out of recession
The number of American households on food stamps reached a new record high in March, according to new data released by the Agriculture Department. 
The March numbers the USDA released Friday reveal 23,116,441 households enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, each receiving an average monthly benefit of $274.30. 
The number of individuals on SNAP did not break any records but remained high, with 47,727,052 people enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly benefit of $132.86.
The number of individuals on SNAP hit a record high in December, with 47,792,056 people enrolled. 
SNAP has been in the news in recent years and months as the program’s rolls have ballooned and the cost has quadrupled since 2001 and doubled since President Obama took office.
Nearly a quarter of the households in this country depend on the government to put food on the table.

One hundred million of our fellow countrymen are enrolled in at least one welfare program aimed at helping them make ends meet.

Recovery?

This is a depression and it won’t be getting better any time soon.

Author Bio

Mac would be considered by some to be a doom and gloomer, though he believes reality is reality, and he tries to assign no positive or negative personalperceptionsto any particular event. Mac provides personal commentary and a spin on news and current events. Mac Slavo writes and edits thewebsite: SHTFPlan.com

Parents Of Slain Navy Seal Claim Tapping Sounds On Phone, Strange Texts After Son’s Death

Jack Blood, Deadlinelive.info | 

Navy Seals have been dying in record numbers ever since the ALLEGED Killing of Osama Bin Laden. This story seems to merge the latest NSA Spying scandal with that event.

Was the Govt (and shadow govt) spying on this family to see if they may have been told anything about the OBL cover up? (BTW: This exact thing happen to Jack Blood during this website’s reporting of the Nick Berg Beheading in 2003)



A Philadelphia couple has joined the first class-action lawsuit against the Obama administration over the National Security Agency’s collection of millions of customer phone records from Verizon.

The plaintiffs are calling the domestic spy operation a breach of privacy.

Filed in federal court in Washington, DC on Sunday, the lawsuit names a host of heavy hitters including President Obama, the NSA, and the Department of Justice.

“It’s a violation of our privacy rights, our freedom of association, our due process rights,” says attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch.

Klayman originally filed the lawsuit last week as the sole plaintiff. On Sunday, Charles and Mary Anne Strange — a Philadelphia couple whose son Michael, a US Navy Seal, was killed in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan in 2011 (see related story) — joined the suit as a class action.

“Somebody has to be held accountable for my son’s death. Thirty brave Americans, the biggest loss in the Afghan war. And that’s when I started asking questions, that’s when my phone got tapped,” Strange said.

Strange claims he heard tapping noises while on the phone and he says he started getting odd texts shortly after his son’s death.

“I called Verizon, ‘I have a text 001 and 002’ and I called them up and I said ‘who’s this?’ and they said it’s somebody listening in from the United States, and someone from Afghanistan,” Strange explained.

The plaintiffs say they have been highly critical of the current administration and are likely targets.

[...]

Wednesday, 12 June 2013

UN To Countries: Comply With Our Policies On Energy Or Stop Using Fossil Fuels

Susanne Posel, Contributor |

The 2013 World Energy Outlook (WEO) reportentitled “Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map” produced by the International Energy Agency (IEA) claims that China is the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases and should invest in renewable energy while mandating energy efficiency.

Globally, emissions of CO2 rose by 1.4% in 2012. Japan alone had a 6% rise which coincides with their phasing out of nuclear power.

The IEA would like to see global compliance to 4 policies that would endeavor to control the climate and not harm economic growth of individual nations.

• Constructing and improving energy efficient buildings
• Improving industry and transport
• Limiting the use of energy wasting power plants
• Halving methane emissions
• Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies

Faith Birol, chief economist for the IEA, wants governments across the globe to take the findings of the 2013 WEO report seriously and make the necessary adjustments to come into compliance with their recommendations.

Looking to 2020, the international community should spend $1.5 trillion to adhere to climate targets.

The IEA expects that all governments would contribute to this investment into schemes to stored CO2 which would enable fossil fuels to continue to be used.

Maria van der Hoeven, executive director of the IEA said : “Climate change has quite frankly slipped to the back burner of policy priorities. But the problem is not going away — quite the opposite.”

Negotiations are in the works between countries and the UN to stike a global deal that would force all nations to adhere to international law concerning CO2 emissions.

With governments having the choice of whether or not to participate now, after this agreement were signed, the UN would be able to take over and force a nation to comply.

Birol said: “The IEA has also warned of the dangers of locking in fossil fuel infrastructure, which would need to be retired early, at great additional cost, in order to meet the 2C target. The IEA’s message is crystal clear: dither and delay in making the transition to a low-carbon energy system will be risky and expensive.”

Aggressive actions to make sure governments comply with international mandates on climate change would have energy corporations time to strategize.

Indeed there is the reality that adherence to the suggestions of the WEO would “require the complete reorientation of our fossil- fuelled energy system valued in the trillions of dollars.”

The WEO report claims that a move toward natural gas as a replacement for coal would “reduce [CO2] emissions by 200 million tons.”

Recently General Electric (GE) has invested in Hydraulic fracturing (a.k.a. fracking) and petrol cultivation with a focus on natural gas extraction.

The National Research Council (NRC) has released a study on fracking which fracking causes earthquakes, yet claims that it is still a “low risk”. They blame carbon capture for “inducing seismic events”, although there is insufficient scientific data to make such a claim.

The explanation the NRC provides is the injection of wastewater underground that causes earthquakes that can be felt by people above ground. The NRC says that “the total balance of fluid introduced or removed underground” determines whether or not earthquakes occur.

In Europe, Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWF), an alarmist think-tank that purveys the lie of man-made climate change, describes fracking as a “clean energy source”.

In another study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the current method of carbon capture by storing the gas underground is directly causational to earthquakes.

The IPCC is responsible for the use of fracking as a pollution control to move away from coal-based electrical power.

In November of 2012, a new study published by the World Bank, there is a call for “stepping up efforts” to meet the global carbon reduction levels to avert catastrophic consequences that would cause of the planet’s temperature to rise an estimated 4 degrees Celsius before the end of the century.

Stephanie Pfeifer, chief executive of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)explained : “This scenario threatens to have severe physical impacts and puts the investments and savings of millions of people at risk. Investors support strong and concerted climate action now to bring emissions down. The measures in this report could save trillions in future adaptation costs, but they will not be achieved without tough policy decisions including putting a high price on carbon, phasing out billions in fossil fuel subsidies and introducing frameworks which stimulate investment in low-carbon energy.”

Govindswamy Bala, associate professor, Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, Indian Institute of Science (IISc) remarked that geoengineering to combat CO2 in the atmosphere is an intentional planetary scale technique to counteract the effects of climate change induced by long-lived greenhouse gases. [And in essence] we do not have complete knowledge of the risks and side effects. Further, geoengineering cuts across national boundaries and hence it is a global commons problem. Hence, we will need international — legal and governance — frameworks. Given the track record of global negotiations on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the chances of reaching an international agreement on geoengineering are remote.”

Author Bio

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news-site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

 
whiteowlconspiracy.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking amazon.com, amazonsupply.com, or myhabit.com.